California's Gay Marriage Decision
Four years ago, the California Supreme Court decided that same-sex marriage licenses issued at San Francisco's City Hall were "unlawful." Although California has conferred legal benefits to same-sex couples since 1999 through "registered domestic partnerships" (Page 3), in the absence of a judicial determination, "civil marriage" was reserved for opposite-sex couples.
That lapse was remedied by the same high court on May 15*. The justices ruled (excerpts below and on the following eight pages) that neither one's "capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship" nor "the responsibility to care for and raise children" (Page 7) depends upon an individual's sexual orientation. The state constitution guarantees the "right to marry" as integral to "liberty and personal autonomy" (Page 6), and each person has the right to establish an "officially recognized and protected family" and "to have their family relationship accorded dignity and respect" (Page 8).

Send Hot Document ideas to . Please indicate whether you wish to remain anonymous.

Correction, May 19, 2008: This article originally referred to April 15 as the date of the ruling. (Return to the corrected sentence.)
- Your New Small Business Committee Chairwoman
- Count Yourself In On the Money-making
- The Obama Stimulus Plan and Small Business
The Day She Was Sent to Auschwitz
Girl Who Pretended To Be a Guy Now Pretends To Be Crazy
The Proper Way To Flagellate Yourself During Ashura
The Miserable Fate of Democrats Who Endorsed McCain
What Obama's Justice Department Appointees Should Fix First
Algerian Guy Walks Across America, Decides We're Pretty Nice









